For GCs and subs — construction documents only

Which revision governs? Cited from your drawings in 24 hours.

Email one real question from a live job. You get the answer, the sheet, and the revision — or we say we don't know. No login. We don't guess on code, cost, or safety.

No signup · No credit card · Cited answer back in 24 hours · Privacy

If we can't answer it from your documents, we'll tell you exactly what's missing — that's the product. Prefer email? Send it to [email protected] instead →

"Cited, revision-aware answers on a live electrical scope on a Kelowna, BC commercial project — escalated to a human instead of guessing on code." — Northbridge Construction, GC
 Re: Bid leveling — electrical package
Answer

Leveled against the IFC electrical scope, Summit Electric is the only fully scope-complete bid — it prices the entire package with no exclusions. The two lower quotes each omit a required scope item that would almost certainly return as a change order. The award decision is yours — IntelMS levels and flags the gaps; it doesn't select the contract.

Sources

Summit_Electric_Quote.pdf p.1–3 · Coastal_Power_Quote.pdf p.2 (exclusions) · Valley_Electric_Quote.pdf p.1 · IFC scope E-001, E-220, E-301, E-401 · Spec 26 05 00, 28 31 00.

Revision used

IFC set Rev 3 (2026-04-18) · quotes as received.

Confidence

Medium  Completeness judged against the IFC scope; each exclusion is stated explicitly in the quote, but final scope interpretation is yours.

Flags

⚠ Needs human review  Awarding a bid is a contractual decision — IntelMS does not award. Coastal's apparent low price omits a code-required fire-alarm tie-in; compare like-for-like before deciding.

Send us your hardest question.

Forward a real RFI, spec, or change-order question (attach the documents if you can) and get an IntelMS-grade cited answer back in 24 hours.

Email one question — cited answer free in 24h

or email [email protected] directly