Incoming email from the Project Manager:
"I've attached the IFC drawings and all the quotes we received for this project. Pick the best candidate and check whether they've included the most complete price."
Answer
Nivelado contra el alcance eléctrico IFC, Summit Electric es la única oferta con alcance totalmente completo — cotiza todo el paquete sin exclusiones. Las dos cotizaciones más bajas omiten cada una un elemento de alcance requerido que casi con certeza volvería como una orden de cambio, así que no son comparables de igual a igual. La decisión de adjudicación es tuya — IntelMS nivela y señala las brechas; no selecciona el contrato.
Leveling vs. IFC scope
| Proveedor | Cotizado | Brecha de alcance vs. IFC |
|---|
| Summit Electric | $487,200 | None — full E-001–E-401, 400A service, fire-alarm tie-in, LV/AV rough-in |
| Coastal Power | $441,500 | Excludes fire-alarm tie-in (req'd E-301 / spec 28 31 00) — gap ≈ $38–46k |
| Valley Electric | $462,800 | Excludes 400A main service swap (E-001 Det. 2) + AV conduit (E-220) |
Sources
Summit_Electric_Quote.pdf p.1–3 · Coastal_Power_Quote.pdf p.2 (exclusions) · Valley_Electric_Quote.pdf p.1 · IFC scope E-001, E-220, E-301, E-401 · Spec 26 05 00, 28 31 00.
Revision used
IFC set Rev 3 (2026-04-18) · quotes as received.
Confidence
Media Completeness judged against the IFC scope; each exclusion is stated explicitly in the quote, but final scope interpretation is yours.
Flags
⚠ Requiere revisión humana Awarding a bid is a contractual decision — IntelMS does not award. Coastal's apparent low price omits a code-required fire-alarm tie-in; compare like-for-like before deciding.
